It’s the Leicester Half Marathon today and my third time of
competing in it. The course remains unchanged, on road until almost half way
then back through parkland before a final bit through the city centre and the
climb up the only real hill on the whole course.
I do love this race which feels like a really small time
race even though it’s a 'big city' one. It could really do with a big sponsor\organiser
to come in and move it on a bit. There is huge potential here, numbers could easily
be doubled I would think, for what is very underrated race.
Throughout the race my pace is almost identical to last year’s, at each
split I’m hitting almost the same time. Last year I did 1:40:01, so this year
having dragged myself up that final mile uphill it’s a case of leg it as hard as
I can once the course flattens out again around mile 13.
I’m not usually one for a sprint finish and this one almost
finishes me off. I tumble over the line and collapse in a heap on the tarmac. My watch
says 1:39:59 but what does the official timing say?
It isn’t until much later that I get confirmation that I
have indeed managed to drag this ageing body over the line in under 100 minutes.
Albeit by just one second. If the drinks at the feed stations hadn’t been in
cups I’d probably have broken it more easily.
The multitude of data I then gets tells me of an average
speed of 7.86 mph, pace 7:37 min/mile,
VO2 max estimated at 45.1 (ml/kg/min) and really bizarrely a
chip time as 21-29 year-old of 01:29:11. WTF. How the
hell do they work that out?
Are they telling me that if I’d been doing half marathon’s
20 years ago I’d be breaking the holy grail of 1:30? B******s. That's a bizarre statistic that
I didn't need to know.
L says it would've been more handy if they're predicted my
race time in 10 years’ time. I’m not convinced, I’d just end up killing myself to prove it was wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment